Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's recent statement is likely to spark a significant response from Donald Trump, according to a PR consultant speaking to Newsweek. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex's Archewell Foundation criticized Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg for eliminating fact-checkers, suggesting the move was politically motivated, possibly in reference to the incoming president. They also praised leaders who resist bullying, implying that Meta had prioritized profit over public safety.
PR expert Nick Ede noted that Trump might see the statement as a challenge and could retaliate, especially given his past antagonism toward the couple. "Trump is not one to back down and could target them in whatever way he does," Ede said. This conflict could escalate, particularly with Trump aligned with conservative groups like The Heritage Foundation, which has previously argued that Harry should not receive a U.S. visa due to past drug use.
The timing of Meta’s decision to drop fact-checkers, two weeks before Trump’s inauguration, is significant, as Zuckerberg had previously cited Trump’s influence as part of the reason for introducing fact-checking in the first place. The Archewell Foundation expressed concern over Meta’s decision, calling it deceptive and contrary to its stated values. The foundation urged the company to reinstate safeguards to protect users, advocating for integrity and safety in online spaces.
Ede suggested that while the statement could invite further backlash from Trump, it also aligns with the Sussexes' long-standing campaign for safer social media spaces. The couple’s advocacy in this area has been ongoing, especially through initiatives like the Archewell Foundation Parents' Network, which they established in 2024.
Harry and Meghan have a history of opposing Trump. Meghan criticized him as misogynistic in 2016, and Harry later condemned his handling of climate change. Although they refrained from engaging in the 2024 election, speculation had circulated that Trump might use Harry’s past drug use to challenge his U.S. visa status. Eric Trump dismissed these concerns, affirming that the Trump family respects the monarchy.
Mark Zuckerberg’s original announcement about scrapping the fact-checking program was framed around criticism of legacy media's portrayal of misinformation and its impact on trust. However, the decision has drawn backlash, with critics, including the Sussexes, arguing that Meta's actions prioritize profit over the well-being of users, particularly marginalized communities. Christopher Bouzy, founder of the rival social media platform Spoutible, praised the Sussexes for their commitment to truth and transparency.
As the Sussexes continue their advocacy on social media responsibility, their criticism of Meta is likely to intensify, though their carefully worded statement suggests they are trying to avoid a direct confrontation with the Trump family. The full consequences of their comments remain to be seen.
Comments
Post a Comment